SCIENTIFIC AND EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY FOR CULTURAL STUDIES
SCIENTIFIC ASSOCIATION OF CULTURE RESEARCHERS

Culture of culture

Scientific peer-reviewed electronic periodical
Since 2014

РУС ENG

New Year's greetings

 

Hypotheses:

THEORETICAL REVIEW

V.M. Mezhuyev. Philosophy of culture in the system of modern knowledge about culture

E.A. Orlova. Sociocultural reality: towards the definition of the concept

V.I. Ionesov. Humanistic Anthropology in the Science of Culture: Rereading Claude Levi-Strauss

 

Discussions:

IN SEARCH OF THE MEANING OF HISTORY AND CULTURE (A.Ya. Flier's sectoin)

A.V. Kostina, A.Ya. Flier. Ternary functional model of culture (beginning)

N.A. Khrenov. A Century later: the tragic experience of Soviet Culture (beginning)

V.M. Rozin. "The Peasant Girl": an existential choice, extremely difficult in life, but possible in art

 

Analytics:

CULTURAL REFLECTIONS

A.Ya. Flier. The social experience of a person and its important component, the "second reality"

N.A. Khrenov. The Russian Revolution from the point of view of the transitional situation in the history of culture. Rehabilitation of the Imperial complex as a consequence of the period of reaction in the history of the Revolution (ending)

V.M. Rozin. Conditions for the introduction and conceivability of the category "reality"

N.A. Khrenov. Russian culture at the turn of the XIX-XX centuries: the Gnostic "Renaissance" in the context of Hegel's symbolism (Semiotic turn in the culture of the twentieth century) (beginning)


Announcement of the next issue

 

 

Grachev Vladimir Innokentievich,
Doctor of Cultural Studies, Professor
Leningrad state
University of. A.S. Pushkin
e-mail: vig1947@mail.ru

The Great Russian ReVolution or «Great Upheaval»)?!
(the values and traditions of culture in post –reVolution chronotope)

Abstract. The article describes the ratio of key concepts and word-formation associated with reVolutionary and post-reVolutionary events took place in Russia 1917 year, radically altered the social and cultural condition of Russian society. It is the basis of cultural values and traditions in the national ethnic groups and cultures. Their associates into a whole system of synergetic socio-cultural communication that defines the structure, similarity, difference, opposition interdependence, ambivalence and to them in the post-reVolution "socio-cultura chronotope ".

Keywords. Culture, reVolution, eVolution, value, tradition, communication, society, socio-cultural space, system, synergy, paradigm, chronotope.
 

[1] Gorky M. Untimely thoughts: Notes on revolution and culture. M.: Soviet pisatel’, 1990. P. 92.
[2] Ibid. P.92.
[3] Ibid.
[4] Values and communication in modern society. SPb.: GPU, 2012. 220 p.
[5] Leont'ev K. N. Byzantism and Slavdom. M.: 1967. 346 p.
[6] Karsavin L. p. East, West and Russian tradition. SPb.: ACADEMIA, 1922. P. 12.
[7] Grachev V. I. Communication – Values – Culture (experience of information and axiological analysis: Monograph. SPb.:.Asterion, 2006. 248 p.
[8] Kuhn T. S. the Structure of scientific revolutions. M.: Progress, 1977.  300 p.
[9] The Paradigm approach is increasingly spread in cultural and other studies. Suffice it to mention only some names of the most well-known foreign and domestic scholars who conducted and conducting their: T. Kuhn, C., pierce, R. Jacobson, E. Seppir, J. Andries, F. de Saussure, C. Levi-Strauss, M. Foucault, J. Liotard. R. Barthes, U. Eco; Y. M. Lotman, M. P. Kagan, E. V. Sokolov, V. P. Stepin, G. L. Tulchinsky, A. Y. Flier, A. P. Kalmykov. P. V. Klyagin, A. P. Markov, G. M., Birjiniuk, V. I. Grachev, M. V. Maasai, A. V. Kostina, D. O. Shipunova, N.. Fucking.
[10] Vekhi; Intelligentsia in Russia: Sat. article 1909-1910 y. M.: Molodaya Gvardiya, 1991. 462 p.
[11] Lunacharsky A.V. the great revolution (October revolution). Part 1. Ed. Z. I. Grzhebin's publishing house. Pg., 1919. 99 p.
[12] Lavrov V. M. Orthodox view of the Lenin experiment on Russia. M.: Father's house, 2018. 96 p.
[13] Ortega y Gasset H. "Dehumanization of art" and other works. Essay on literature and art. M.: Rainbow, 1991. 639 p.
[14] About this diversity of scientists ' positions in the evaluation of the modern socio-cultural paradigm see: Grachev V. I. Communicative-axiogenic paradigm of culture ecology // Culture. 2018.  No. 3. Primas'. 6.
[15] Grachev V. I. Modern art culture: paradigm or discourse?! (comparative axiological analysis). Monograph. SPb.: Asterion. 2016. 274 p.
[16] Borealist realism: a modern look and a Modern look. M.: Olympus, 2008. P. 459.

 

 

ISSN 2311-3723

Founder:
OOO «Soglasie» publisher

Publisher:
Scientific Association of Culture Researchers

Official registration № ЭЛ № ФС 77 – 56414 от 11.12.2013

The magazine is indexed:

Issued quarterly in electronic form only

 

Issue produced by:

Editorial Director
A. Flier

Editor in Chief
T. Glazkova

Head of IT Center
A. Lukyanov

 

Our banner:

Our e-mail:
cultschool@gmail.com

 

 
 

OUR PARTNERS:

РУС ENG