Электронный журнал «Культура культуры»

SCIENTIFIC AND EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY FOR CULTURAL STUDIES
SCIENTIFIC ASSOCIATION OF CULTURE RESEARCHERS

Scientific peer-reviewed electronic periodical
Since 2014

Hypotheses:

ANTHROPOLOGY

V.I. Ionesov. Anthropology of Things in the Subject Articulations of Culture

Discussions:

IN SEARCH OF THE MEANING OF HISTORY AND CULTURE (A.Ya. Flier's section)

A.Ya. Flier. Culture as normative social behavior

N.A. Khrenov. The Russian Revolution from the point of view of the transitional situation in the history of culture. Rehabilitation of the Imperial complex as a consequence of the period of reaction in the history of the Revolution (beginning)

V.M. Rozin. Evolution of ideas about thinking

A.A. Pelipenko. The subject of civilization after the Dualistic Revolution (beginning)

Analytics:

CULTURAL REFLECTIONS

A.Ya. Flier. Myth and the problem of interpretation of culture

N.A. Khrenov. Culture and technology: from the organ projection of E. Kappa to the objectification of the spirit of Hegel (Semiotic turn in the culture of the twentieth century) (beginning)

V.M. Rozin. Tops and the peculiarity of consciousness

REPUBLICATION

O.N. Astafieva, A.Ya. Flier. Socio-cultural modernization: the formation of a new cultural environment

Announcement of the next issue

Khrenov Nikolay Andreevich,
Doctor of Philosophy, Professor,
All-Russian State University
of Cinematography named after S.A. Gerasimov.
e-mail: nihrenov@mail.ru

The Superman in the Russian version:
philosophical aspects of the novel by F. Dostoevsky's "Demons"
and V. Khotinenko's film based on this novel
(ending)

Abstract. The article analyzes the novel by F. Dostoevsky's "Demons". It also makes some observations on the attempt of director V. Khotinenko to present his cinematic incarnation. Realizing that during the adaptation of this novel, the criminal-adventurous theme usually comes to the fore (in general, such plots turn out well in the cinema, and this is due to the specifics of this art form), the author tries to analyze those philosophical meanings of the novel, without which the aesthetics and poetics of the works of F. Dostoevsky simply does not exist. Aiming to demonstrate the philosophical implications of the novel "Demons", the author shows that Dostoevsky's ideas are consonant with Western philosophy and not only of the nineteenth, but also of the twentieth century. Thus, S. Kierkegaard and F. Nietzsche appear in his field of vision. Through the prism of the philosophical ideas of these thinkers, the ideas of the novel "Demons" are considered. In this sense, attention is drawn to the author's desire to present the hero of the novel, Nikolai Stavrogin, with what F. Nietzsche calls a "superman". "Man-god" as a concept used by Dostoevsky in the novel is a synonym for "superman" by F. Nietzsche. Dostoevsky represents such a trend in philosophy, which in the twentieth century receives a designation as the philosophy of existentialism. Another representative of Russian existentialism, L. Shestov, reads Dostoevsky's later novels in this vein. Singling out Stavrogin's Demons among the characters of the novel, the author of this article seeks to show that the biography and ideas of this central hero in the novel, representing the sixties of the nineteenth century, or, more precisely, nihilists, must be considered in a long time, which began with the "Voltaire" of the XVIII century and ending with the decadence of the turn of the XIX-XX centuries. Dostoevsky anticipates not only the Russian Renaissance of the early twentieth century, designated today as the Silver Age, but also decadence. Thus, the author confirms the idea of D. Merezhkovsky, who presented Dostoevsky, as well as L. Tolstoy, by anticipating the heyday of Russian culture, which is known as the Silver Age with its spiritual breakthroughs, but also with longing and attraction to Thanatos.

Keywords. Dostoevsky, the novel "Demons", Kierkegaard, Nietzsche, V. Soloviev, L. Shestov, N. Berdyaev, S. Bulgakov, Kant, D. Merezhkovsky, Camus, nihilism, positivism, romanticism, superman, man-god, God-man, existentialism, Stavrogin, Verkhovensky, Bakunin, Nechaev, Marquis de Sade, decadence, Legend about the grand Inquisitor, the man from the underground, Plato's cave, big time, V. Khotinenko.

[71] Turgenev I. Three portraits // Turgenev I. Essays. Vol. 4. M., 1980. p. 86.
[72] Grigoriev A. Lermontov and his direction. // Time. No. 11. M., 1862. p. 51.
[73] Ibid. p. 65.
[74 ]Ibid. p. 70.
[75] Dostoevsky F. Collected works: in 15 vol. t. 7. Leningrad: Nauka. Leningrad branch. 1990. p. 269.
[76] Shcherbatov M. On the damage of morals in Russia by Prince M. Shcherbatov and the Journey of A. Radishchev. M., 1985. C. 42.
[77] Pylyaev M. Old Petersburg. Stories from the former life of the capital. St. Petersburg, 1887. C. 330.
[78] Ibid., p. 330.
[79] Aksakov S. Collected works: in 5 vols. Vol. 1. M., 1966. p. 101.
[80] Ibid., p. 106.
[81] Dostoevsky F. Decree. Op. C. 269.
[82] Khrenov N., Sokolov K. The artistic life of Imperial Russia (subcultures, worldviews, mentality). St. Petersburg: Aleteya, 2001. p. 585.
[83] Dostoevsky F. Decree. Op. C. 221.
[84] Ibid., p. 345.
[85] Ibid. p. 441.
[86] Blok A. Collected works: in 8 vol. t. 5. M.-L.: State Publishing House of Fiction, 1962. p. 345.
[87] Ibid. p. 348.
[88] Dostoevsky F. Decree. Op. C. 45.
[89] The dispute about Bakunin and Dostoevsky. Articles by L. Grossman and Vyach. Polonsky. L.: State Publishing House, 1926. p. 9.
[90] Ibid.
[91] Dostoevsky F. Decree. Op. C. 45.
[92] Camus A. Decree. Op. C. 239
[93] Ibid., p. 241.
[94] Ibid., p. 85.
[95] Dostoevsky F. Decree. Op. C. 43.
[96] Panchenko A. The Silver Age and the death of Russia // Lectures and reports of members of the Russian Academy of Sciences at SPbGUP (1993-2013): in 3 vols. 3. St. Petersburg, 2013. p. 527.
[97] Bulgakov S. Two hail. Research on the nature of social ideals. St. Petersburg: Publishing House of the Russian Christian Humanitarian Institute, 1997. p. 259.
[98] Soloviev V. Literary Criticism. Moscow: Sovremennik, 1990. p. 277.
[99] Ibid. p. 286.
[100] Camus A. Decree. op. p. 133.
[101] Ibid., p. 156.
[102] Merezhkovsky D. L. Tolstoy and Dostoevsky. Decree. op. p. 275.
[103] Bulgakov S. Russian tragedy. Decree. op. p. 504.
[104] Lotman Yu. Selected articles: in 3 vols. 3. Tallinn: "Alexandra", 1993. p. 96.
[105] Ibid. p. 101.
[106] Merezhkovsky D. L. Tolstoy and Dostoevsky. Decree. op. p. 275.
[107] Dostoevsky F. Decree. Op. C. 269.

ISSN 2311-3723

Founder:
OOO «Soglasie» publisher

Publisher:
Scientific Association of Culture Researchers

Official registration № ЭЛ № ФС 77 – 56414 от 11.12.2013

The magazine is indexed:

Issued quarterly in electronic form only

Issue produced by:

Editorial Director
A. Flier

Editor in Chief
T. Glazkova

Head of IT Center
A. Lukyanov

Our banner:

Our e-mail:
cultschool@gmail.com

OUR PARTNERS:

SCIENTIFIC AND EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY FOR CULTURAL STUDIES SCIENTIFIC ASSOCIATION OF CULTURE RESEARCHERS Scientific peer-reviewed electronic periodical Since 2014
	NEW ISSUE ABOUT EDITORS TO AUTORS ARCHIVE	РУС ENG

Hypotheses: ANTHROPOLOGY V.I. Ionesov. Anthropology of Things in the Subject Articulations of Culture Discussions: IN SEARCH OF THE MEANING OF HISTORY AND CULTURE (A.Ya. Flier's section) A.Ya. Flier. Culture as normative social behavior N.A. Khrenov. The Russian Revolution from the point of view of the transitional situation in the history of culture. Rehabilitation of the Imperial complex as a consequence of the period of reaction in the history of the Revolution (beginning) V.M. Rozin. Evolution of ideas about thinking A.A. Pelipenko. The subject of civilization after the Dualistic Revolution (beginning) Analytics: CULTURAL REFLECTIONS A.Ya. Flier. Myth and the problem of interpretation of culture N.A. Khrenov. Culture and technology: from the organ projection of E. Kappa to the objectification of the spirit of Hegel (Semiotic turn in the culture of the twentieth century) (beginning) V.M. Rozin. Tops and the peculiarity of consciousness REPUBLICATION O.N. Astafieva, A.Ya. Flier. Socio-cultural modernization: the formation of a new cultural environment Announcement of the next issue	Khrenov Nikolay Andreevich, Doctor of Philosophy, Professor, All-Russian State University of Cinematography named after S.A. Gerasimov. e-mail: nihrenov@mail.ru The Superman in the Russian version: philosophical aspects of the novel by F. Dostoevsky's "Demons" and V. Khotinenko's film based on this novel (ending) Abstract. The article analyzes the novel by F. Dostoevsky's "Demons". It also makes some observations on the attempt of director V. Khotinenko to present his cinematic incarnation. Realizing that during the adaptation of this novel, the criminal-adventurous theme usually comes to the fore (in general, such plots turn out well in the cinema, and this is due to the specifics of this art form), the author tries to analyze those philosophical meanings of the novel, without which the aesthetics and poetics of the works of F. Dostoevsky simply does not exist. Aiming to demonstrate the philosophical implications of the novel "Demons", the author shows that Dostoevsky's ideas are consonant with Western philosophy and not only of the nineteenth, but also of the twentieth century. Thus, S. Kierkegaard and F. Nietzsche appear in his field of vision. Through the prism of the philosophical ideas of these thinkers, the ideas of the novel "Demons" are considered. In this sense, attention is drawn to the author's desire to present the hero of the novel, Nikolai Stavrogin, with what F. Nietzsche calls a "superman". "Man-god" as a concept used by Dostoevsky in the novel is a synonym for "superman" by F. Nietzsche. Dostoevsky represents such a trend in philosophy, which in the twentieth century receives a designation as the philosophy of existentialism. Another representative of Russian existentialism, L. Shestov, reads Dostoevsky's later novels in this vein. Singling out Stavrogin's Demons among the characters of the novel, the author of this article seeks to show that the biography and ideas of this central hero in the novel, representing the sixties of the nineteenth century, or, more precisely, nihilists, must be considered in a long time, which began with the "Voltaire" of the XVIII century and ending with the decadence of the turn of the XIX-XX centuries. Dostoevsky anticipates not only the Russian Renaissance of the early twentieth century, designated today as the Silver Age, but also decadence. Thus, the author confirms the idea of D. Merezhkovsky, who presented Dostoevsky, as well as L. Tolstoy, by anticipating the heyday of Russian culture, which is known as the Silver Age with its spiritual breakthroughs, but also with longing and attraction to Thanatos. Keywords. Dostoevsky, the novel "Demons", Kierkegaard, Nietzsche, V. Soloviev, L. Shestov, N. Berdyaev, S. Bulgakov, Kant, D. Merezhkovsky, Camus, nihilism, positivism, romanticism, superman, man-god, God-man, existentialism, Stavrogin, Verkhovensky, Bakunin, Nechaev, Marquis de Sade, decadence, Legend about the grand Inquisitor, the man from the underground, Plato's cave, big time, V. Khotinenko. [71] Turgenev I. Three portraits // Turgenev I. Essays. Vol. 4. M., 1980. p. 86. [72] Grigoriev A. Lermontov and his direction. // Time. No. 11. M., 1862. p. 51. [73] Ibid. p. 65. [74 ]Ibid. p. 70. [75] Dostoevsky F. Collected works: in 15 vol. t. 7. Leningrad: Nauka. Leningrad branch. 1990. p. 269. [76] Shcherbatov M. On the damage of morals in Russia by Prince M. Shcherbatov and the Journey of A. Radishchev. M., 1985. C. 42. [77] Pylyaev M. Old Petersburg. Stories from the former life of the capital. St. Petersburg, 1887. C. 330. [78] Ibid., p. 330. [79] Aksakov S. Collected works: in 5 vols. Vol. 1. M., 1966. p. 101. [80] Ibid., p. 106. [81] Dostoevsky F. Decree. Op. C. 269. [82] Khrenov N., Sokolov K. The artistic life of Imperial Russia (subcultures, worldviews, mentality). St. Petersburg: Aleteya, 2001. p. 585. [83] Dostoevsky F. Decree. Op. C. 221. [84] Ibid., p. 345. [85] Ibid. p. 441. [86] Blok A. Collected works: in 8 vol. t. 5. M.-L.: State Publishing House of Fiction, 1962. p. 345. [87] Ibid. p. 348. [88] Dostoevsky F. Decree. Op. C. 45. [89] The dispute about Bakunin and Dostoevsky. Articles by L. Grossman and Vyach. Polonsky. L.: State Publishing House, 1926. p. 9. [90] Ibid. [91] Dostoevsky F. Decree. Op. C. 45. [92] Camus A. Decree. Op. C. 239 [93] Ibid., p. 241. [94] Ibid., p. 85. [95] Dostoevsky F. Decree. Op. C. 43. [96] Panchenko A. The Silver Age and the death of Russia // Lectures and reports of members of the Russian Academy of Sciences at SPbGUP (1993-2013): in 3 vols. 3. St. Petersburg, 2013. p. 527. [97] Bulgakov S. Two hail. Research on the nature of social ideals. St. Petersburg: Publishing House of the Russian Christian Humanitarian Institute, 1997. p. 259. [98] Soloviev V. Literary Criticism. Moscow: Sovremennik, 1990. p. 277. [99] Ibid. p. 286. [100] Camus A. Decree. op. p. 133. [101] Ibid., p. 156. [102] Merezhkovsky D. L. Tolstoy and Dostoevsky. Decree. op. p. 275. [103] Bulgakov S. Russian tragedy. Decree. op. p. 504. [104] Lotman Yu. Selected articles: in 3 vols. 3. Tallinn: "Alexandra", 1993. p. 96. [105] Ibid. p. 101. [106] Merezhkovsky D. L. Tolstoy and Dostoevsky. Decree. op. p. 275. [107] Dostoevsky F. Decree. Op. C. 269.	ISSN 2311-3723 Founder: OOO «Soglasie» publisher Publisher: Scientific Association of Culture Researchers Official registration № ЭЛ № ФС 77 – 56414 от 11.12.2013 The magazine is indexed: Issued quarterly in electronic form only *Issue produced by:* Editorial Director A. Flier Editor in Chief T. Glazkova Head of IT Center A. Lukyanov Our banner: Our e-mail: cultschool@gmail.com OUR PARTNERS:

	NEW ISSUE ABOUT EDITORS TO AUTORS ARCHIVE	РУС ENG
Разработка сайта Мнение редакции может не совпадать с мнением авторов. При полном или частичном использовании материалов ссылка на «Культуру культуры» обязательна. © Научная ассоциация исследователей культуры, 2014-2023