Электронный журнал «Культура культуры» :: Experience of comparing parameters of social types of modern subcultures

SCIENTIFIC AND EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY FOR CULTURAL STUDIES
SCIENTIFIC ASSOCIATION OF CULTURE RESEARCHERS

Scientific peer-reviewed electronic periodical
Since 2014

Hypotheses:

ANTHROPOLOGY

V.I. Ionesov. Anthropology of Things in the Subject Articulations of Culture

Discussions:

IN SEARCH OF THE MEANING OF HISTORY AND CULTURE (A.Ya. Flier's section)

A.Ya. Flier. Culture as normative social behavior

N.A. Khrenov. The Russian Revolution from the point of view of the transitional situation in the history of culture. Rehabilitation of the Imperial complex as a consequence of the period of reaction in the history of the Revolution (beginning)

V.M. Rozin. Evolution of ideas about thinking

A.A. Pelipenko. The subject of civilization after the Dualistic Revolution (beginning)

Analytics:

CULTURAL REFLECTIONS

A.Ya. Flier. Myth and the problem of interpretation of culture

N.A. Khrenov. Culture and technology: from the organ projection of E. Kappa to the objectification of the spirit of Hegel (Semiotic turn in the culture of the twentieth century) (beginning)

V.M. Rozin. Tops and the peculiarity of consciousness

REPUBLICATION

O.N. Astafieva, A.Ya. Flier. Socio-cultural modernization: the formation of a new cultural environment

Announcement of the next issue

Flier Andrey Yakovlevich,
Doctor of Philosophy, Professor,
Chief Researcher
D.S. Likhachev Russian Research Institute of Cultural
and Natural Heritage,
Professor at Moscow State
Linguistic University.
e-mail: andrey.flier@yandex.ru

Experience of comparing parameters of social types of modern subcultures

Abstract. The article examines the social characteristics of elite (creative), folk (traditional) and mass cultures. A comparison of their characteristics allows us to come to the conclusion that the elite in its social purpose is mainly a culture of production, the popular is mainly a culture of exchange, and the mass is mainly a culture of consumption. At the same time, now the elite culture is shrinking to a rare and exclusive culture of the intelligentsia, the people's culture is shrinking to a simulatively propagandistic culture of social marginals, and the mass culture, on the contrary, is turning into a universal everyday culture for all classes.

Keywords. Culture, its social functions, elite, popular and mass types of cultures, production, exchange and consumption of cultural products.

[1] Kostina A.V. National culture – ethnic culture – mass culture: "Balance of interests" in modern society. Moscow: URSS, 2009. 216 p.; Gans H. Popular Culture and High Culture; an Analysis and Evolution of Taste. N.Y.: Basic Books, 1974. 352 p., etc.
[2] Davydov Yu.N., Rodnyanskaya I.B. Sociology of counterculture. Critical Analysis. Moscow: Nauka, 1980. 264 p.; Adomo Theodor W., Horkheimer Max. Dialektik der Aufklaerung. Philosophische Fragmente. Frankfurt am Main: S.Fisher Verlag GmbH 1969 (Adorno T., Horkheimer M. Dialectics of Enlightenment. Moscow-St. Petersburg: Medium, Juventa, 1997. 314 p.); Golitsyn G.A. The art of "high" and "low": the systemic role of elite subculture // Creativity in art and the art of creativity. M.: Nauka, 2000. pp. 259-264; Zakharov A.V. Traditional culture in modern society // Sociological Research. 2004. № 7. C. 105-115.
[3] Flier A.Ya. Essays on the theory of historical dynamics of culture. Moscow: Consent, 2014. 528 p.; Flier A.Ya. Man and culture: parameters of conjugacy [Electronic resource] // Culture of culture. 2015. No. 2. URL: http://cult-cult.ru/human-and-culture-factors-of-congruence / (Accessed: 16.9.2017); Flier A.Ya. Philosophical prolegomena to the Normative theory of culture [Electronic resource] // Culture of Culture. 2019. № 1. URL: http://cult-cult.ru/the-philosophical-prolegomena-to-a-normative-theory-of-culture/. (Accessed: 06/18/2021).
[4] Baudrillard Jean. Le système des objets. Gallimard, 1991 (Collection Tel) (Baudrillard J. The System of things. M.: Rudomino, 2001. 96 p.); Bauman, Zyigmunt, The Individualized Society. Cambridge: Polity, 2001 (Bauman Z. Individualized society. Moscow: Logos, 2002. 324 p.); Eko Umberto. A passo di gambero: guerre calde populismo mediatico. RCS Libri S.pA Milan. Bompiani 2006 (Eco U. Full back. Hot wars and populism in the media. Moscow: Eksmo, 2007. 592 p.).
[5] Khachaturian V.M. "The second life" of the Archaic: archaic tendencies in the civilizational process. Moscow: Academia, 2009. 290 p.
[6] Flier A.Ya., Poletaeva M.A. The origin and development of culture. Moscow: MGUKI, 2009. 272 p.; Flier A.Ya. Culture as repression // Fundamental problems of culturology. In 4 vols. Vol. 1. Theory of culture. St. Petersburg: Aleteya, 2008. pp. 242-250.
[7] Flier A.Ya. Cultural foundations of violence (in memory of Osama bin Laden) // Culturology 20-11. Moscow: Consent, 2011. pp. 513-526.
[8] Kostina A.V. The ratio of tradition and creativity as the basis of socio-cultural dynamics. Moscow: URSS, 2009. 144 p .
[9] Surova E.E. Iconic traditions of modernity // New Traditions. St. Petersburg: Petropolis, 2009. pp. 58-79.

ISSN 2311-3723

Founder:
OOO «Soglasie» publisher

Publisher:
Scientific Association of Culture Researchers

Official registration № ЭЛ № ФС 77 – 56414 от 11.12.2013

The magazine is indexed:

Issued quarterly in electronic form only

Issue produced by:

Editorial Director
A. Flier

Editor in Chief
T. Glazkova

Head of IT Center
A. Lukyanov

Our banner:

Our e-mail:
cultschool@gmail.com

OUR PARTNERS:

SCIENTIFIC AND EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY FOR CULTURAL STUDIES SCIENTIFIC ASSOCIATION OF CULTURE RESEARCHERS Scientific peer-reviewed electronic periodical Since 2014
	NEW ISSUE ABOUT EDITORS TO AUTORS ARCHIVE	РУС ENG

Hypotheses: ANTHROPOLOGY V.I. Ionesov. Anthropology of Things in the Subject Articulations of Culture Discussions: IN SEARCH OF THE MEANING OF HISTORY AND CULTURE (A.Ya. Flier's section) A.Ya. Flier. Culture as normative social behavior N.A. Khrenov. The Russian Revolution from the point of view of the transitional situation in the history of culture. Rehabilitation of the Imperial complex as a consequence of the period of reaction in the history of the Revolution (beginning) V.M. Rozin. Evolution of ideas about thinking A.A. Pelipenko. The subject of civilization after the Dualistic Revolution (beginning) Analytics: CULTURAL REFLECTIONS A.Ya. Flier. Myth and the problem of interpretation of culture N.A. Khrenov. Culture and technology: from the organ projection of E. Kappa to the objectification of the spirit of Hegel (Semiotic turn in the culture of the twentieth century) (beginning) V.M. Rozin. Tops and the peculiarity of consciousness REPUBLICATION O.N. Astafieva, A.Ya. Flier. Socio-cultural modernization: the formation of a new cultural environment Announcement of the next issue	Flier Andrey Yakovlevich, Doctor of Philosophy, Professor, Chief Researcher D.S. Likhachev Russian Research Institute of Cultural and Natural Heritage, Professor at Moscow State Linguistic University. e-mail: andrey.flier@yandex.ru Experience of comparing parameters of social types of modern subcultures Abstract. The article examines the social characteristics of elite (creative), folk (traditional) and mass cultures. A comparison of their characteristics allows us to come to the conclusion that the elite in its social purpose is mainly a culture of production, the popular is mainly a culture of exchange, and the mass is mainly a culture of consumption. At the same time, now the elite culture is shrinking to a rare and exclusive culture of the intelligentsia, the people's culture is shrinking to a simulatively propagandistic culture of social marginals, and the mass culture, on the contrary, is turning into a universal everyday culture for all classes. Keywords. Culture, its social functions, elite, popular and mass types of cultures, production, exchange and consumption of cultural products. [1] Kostina A.V. National culture – ethnic culture – mass culture: "Balance of interests" in modern society. Moscow: URSS, 2009. 216 p.; Gans H. Popular Culture and High Culture; an Analysis and Evolution of Taste. N.Y.: Basic Books, 1974. 352 p., etc. [2] Davydov Yu.N., Rodnyanskaya I.B. Sociology of counterculture. Critical Analysis. Moscow: Nauka, 1980. 264 p.; Adomo Theodor W., Horkheimer Max. Dialektik der Aufklaerung. Philosophische Fragmente. Frankfurt am Main: S.Fisher Verlag GmbH 1969 (Adorno T., Horkheimer M. Dialectics of Enlightenment. Moscow-St. Petersburg: Medium, Juventa, 1997. 314 p.); Golitsyn G.A. The art of "high" and "low": the systemic role of elite subculture // Creativity in art and the art of creativity. M.: Nauka, 2000. pp. 259-264; Zakharov A.V. Traditional culture in modern society // Sociological Research. 2004. № 7. C. 105-115. [3] Flier A.Ya. Essays on the theory of historical dynamics of culture. Moscow: Consent, 2014. 528 p.; Flier A.Ya. Man and culture: parameters of conjugacy [Electronic resource] // Culture of culture. 2015. No. 2. URL: http://cult-cult.ru/human-and-culture-factors-of-congruence / (Accessed: 16.9.2017); Flier A.Ya. Philosophical prolegomena to the Normative theory of culture [Electronic resource] // Culture of Culture. 2019. № 1. URL: http://cult-cult.ru/the-philosophical-prolegomena-to-a-normative-theory-of-culture/. (Accessed: 06/18/2021). [4] Baudrillard Jean. Le système des objets. Gallimard, 1991 (Collection Tel) (Baudrillard J. The System of things. M.: Rudomino, 2001. 96 p.); Bauman, Zyigmunt, The Individualized Society. Cambridge: Polity, 2001 (Bauman Z. Individualized society. Moscow: Logos, 2002. 324 p.); Eko Umberto. A passo di gambero: guerre calde populismo mediatico. RCS Libri S.pA Milan. Bompiani 2006 (Eco U. Full back. Hot wars and populism in the media. Moscow: Eksmo, 2007. 592 p.). [5] Khachaturian V.M. "The second life" of the Archaic: archaic tendencies in the civilizational process. Moscow: Academia, 2009. 290 p. [6] Flier A.Ya., Poletaeva M.A. The origin and development of culture. Moscow: MGUKI, 2009. 272 p.; Flier A.Ya. Culture as repression // Fundamental problems of culturology. In 4 vols. Vol. 1. Theory of culture. St. Petersburg: Aleteya, 2008. pp. 242-250. [7] Flier A.Ya. Cultural foundations of violence (in memory of Osama bin Laden) // Culturology 20-11. Moscow: Consent, 2011. pp. 513-526. [8] Kostina A.V. The ratio of tradition and creativity as the basis of socio-cultural dynamics. Moscow: URSS, 2009. 144 p . [9] Surova E.E. Iconic traditions of modernity // New Traditions. St. Petersburg: Petropolis, 2009. pp. 58-79.	ISSN 2311-3723 Founder: OOO «Soglasie» publisher Publisher: Scientific Association of Culture Researchers Official registration № ЭЛ № ФС 77 – 56414 от 11.12.2013 The magazine is indexed: Issued quarterly in electronic form only *Issue produced by:* Editorial Director A. Flier Editor in Chief T. Glazkova Head of IT Center A. Lukyanov Our banner: Our e-mail: cultschool@gmail.com OUR PARTNERS:

	NEW ISSUE ABOUT EDITORS TO AUTORS ARCHIVE	РУС ENG
Разработка сайта Мнение редакции может не совпадать с мнением авторов. При полном или частичном использовании материалов ссылка на «Культуру культуры» обязательна. © Научная ассоциация исследователей культуры, 2014-2023